Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 21 18:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> The fact
>> that sed would be better off with a fix as well was not part of the
>> discussion.
>
> And better so since sed isn't broken. It puts EOF into the isblank
> function and rightly expects that isblank returns 0.
I thought the problem was that it puts 0xff into the isblank function and
gets 1 in some locales where 0xff is an NBSP, if that's not the case I've
misunderstood the thread so far.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
