-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Dave Korn wrote:
> Perhaps the nice thing to would be supply an auxiliary (optional) package
> full of alternative-name helper shell scripts like these. (Apropos of
> nothing, I'll point out that SUS may demand cc, c89 and/or c99, but says
> nothing about cc-3, c89-3, c99-4, or any other such combination.... so it
> might be enough to just ship scripts and let them point to whatever the
> default selected by alternatives is?)
AFAIK there is no reason for a cc *script*, so I think cc should just be
part of the alternatives, pointing to whichever of gcc-{3,4}. I agree
that there need not be a cc-{3,4}, and all of the above would also apply
for c++ and f77/f95.
As for c89/c99, +1 on the script idea; separate versions are definitely
not necessary. Are there supposed to be similar names for the ISO C++
standards (c++98 and c++0x)?
Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEAREIAAYFAknB51YACgkQpiWmPGlmQSNlTgCeJlCATiegaP25pMjiGKhBBfbr
c8IAoJnQ+hZ34gbEUD8EYZ8DUuVlcXL8
=gXGf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
