On Feb 20 14:14, Dave Korn wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >> Apparently. I rebased the DLL alone and afterwards file simply stopped > >> working. The DLL has a base address of 0x6a500000. Even rebasing to > >> the very same address results in a coredump! > > > Nope, I can't reproduce it yet. > > I can now, but not by rebasing to the exact same address; did something just > go amiss in your testing of that particular case maybe?
I have no idea, sorry. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
