Will Parsons wrote: > You may not consider it a compelling argument, but I find the traffic on > the cygwin list more than enough already, and am glad I don't have to > bother about the cygwin-xfree traffic. I'd prefer to keep things as > is.
But on xfree, there IS NO traffic! Just check the archives to get an insight into this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/ This is ridiculously few compared to 2 years ago when Harold L Hunt put more work into this _per week_ than all people together summed up from summer to end of this year! -Andreas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
