Thorsten Kampe wrote on 14 October 2008 21:11:
> * Z W (Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:59:07 -0700)
>> I'm have a shell script, test.sh below to run with cygwin in a Windows
>> box.
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/sh
>>
>> ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'export MAX_MS=100; export OFFSET_MS=89900; export
>> THREADS=4; export RAMP=1; export LOOPS=2; echo load01 ; cd
>> /cygdrive/c/apps/bin ; pwd ; nohup ./start.sh \& ; ps -efW | grep
>> java ; exit '
>
> That's not a shell script - it's just a single command.
Uh, it's a shell script *containing* a single ssh command. Note the
shebang. Also note the mention of the filename "test.sh", which is not to be
confused with the script "start.sh" on the remote machine.
> The multiple export statements are superfluous.
Surely not, if you want the definitions to be visible in the sub-shell that
executes "start.sh"?
> The "cd" looks superfluous, too.
Surely not, unless /cygdrive/c/apps/bin is the qa user's home dir?
> Also the "pwd".
Surely not, if it's a bit of debugging trace that lets ZW know that the
directory exists and so the cd command succeeded and there must be something
else wrong if the script doesn't execute?
> Also the "exit".
Ok, I'm with you there :-) But I still think one of us needs more coffee...
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
