Gustavo Seabra wrote on 10 September 2008 14:51:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Gustavo Seabra wrote on 10 September 2008 14:17:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I was just wondering why there is no Fortran 90/95 compiler in Cygwin,
^^^^^ doh!
>> Actually, there is one[*]; it just doesn't have the word 'fortran' in
>> the name (but it does in the package description):
>> [*] - Actually, there are two[**]:
> Those two apparently only include old (Fortran77) compilers, so they
> don't actually count ;-)
Sorry! Not a fortran-head, didn't spot the significance of the version you
specified.
>> [*] - Actually, now there are three, but the latest one is highly
>> experimental: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2008-09/msg00004.html
>> http://cygwin.com/packages/gcc4-fortran/
>
> OK, now I see... this one actually seems to include 'gfortran' in it,
> which supports Fortran95 standards, so there's actually one. (Or
> should we say 0.90, since it's 'experimental' ;-) )
Well yeh... but then again it's gcc4: it's a compiler-and-a-half!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
