Christopher Faylor wrote:
Phil is 100% correct here. It's heartening to see someone so thoroughly
getting it after having to so frequently deal with the misconceptions
about -mno-cygwin. Confusion about -mwindows is new though.
I'm counting the days until -mno-cygwin disappears. It is a blight that
must be expunged. I know that as soon as it is gone there will be a
general wail from people who use it but it really should never have been
implemented.
As one of "those people" I wonder if it will still be possible to
generate executables that do not depend on cygwin DLLs using
cygwin's gcc?
Cheers, Ralph
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
