On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:38:42PM -0500, Ren? Berber wrote: > But the FAQ seems to endorse NTemacs: > > http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.ntemacs
That isn't really endorsing. It is just mentioned because it really is a FAQ. The FAQ entry ends with: Note that all of this ``just works'' if you use the Cygwin port of Emacs from Cygwin Setup. Which brings us right back around to your original observation that Cygwin has two flavors of emacs which work fine. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
