On Jun 10 12:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 9 20:27, Deti Fliegl wrote: > > Maybe there should be some scope tests (by IN6_IS_ADDR_* macros) in > > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_procnet.cc to provide a consistent value. > > I see. Well, I put this on my TODO list. It shouldn't be too tricky > to generate the same values as on Linux here. But see below...
FYI, I just uploaded 1.7.0-17 to the release-2 area. It's supposed to print scope and flag values as on Linux. I also changed if_indextoname and friends to prefer the IPv6 device index over the v4 index if both exist. That should fix the different index numbers between if_indextoname and /proc/net/if_inet6. Please give it a try. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
