On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:17:51PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote: >Francois Colbert wrote: > >> I think that a simple warning message (or no message at all?) and >> *normal* continuation of the process (ie: no abort) would be sufficient >> since "make" doesn't seem to be using this variable anymore. Its only > >I think the idea is that if you have a Makefile that expects to set >MAKE_MODE to "win32" and use c:/foo/bar-style paths, it will fail >catastrophically anyway, so there's no point in continuing.
That's correct. This behavior is not going to change. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/