> On Jan 17, 2008 9:38 PM, <> wrote: > > The ps that comes with Cygwin is missing a number of features that > > appear to be in the procps-3.2.7/ps/ source code. The source code > > does not look like it was used to build the executable. Is this > > correct? > > Cygwin has both ps and procps available. The ps in Cygwin has the > advantage of showing Windows processes, too. The procps is just what > you'd expect. > > -Jason
The ps from procps appears to be what is in use on Linux. Why is the ps for Cygwin not built from this? >From which package is the ps in Cygwin built? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
