>> ... can the tetex packages be fixed, so that they supply a pdflatex link? > > My understanding is that support for tetex has been stopped and that > in its place texlive is available..
Yes, tetex is not maintained anymore. But the cygwin people have not stopped maintaining their tetex packages, have they? > Are there any plans to adopt the texlive package for cygwin? I would if I > had a good understanding of TeX, but I don't. > > MikTex is a Windows specific implementation and is not aware of posix > pathnames, etc..., so a "native" cygwin tex package would be welcome. Yes please. For me too. But it took a while on Gentoo Linux to make texlive available. I think, it's not that easy and will take a lot of time. So we'll have to wait. For the time being, tetex is quite well. I didn't noticed any advantage of texlive after i switched. (Some more packages/fonts are included - the rest is pretty the same - maybe some bugs are fixed?)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
