Dave Korn wrote: > Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program, not a > cygwin one.
I think you mean "it's a MSVCRT-based program" since DOS hasn't existed in Windows in the last approx. 7 years. (And now if I could only get people to stop incorrectly referring to a NT/2k/XP/Vista command prompt a DOS prompt... and I also want a pony.) Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/