Dave Korn wrote:

>   Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program, not a 
> cygwin one.

I think you mean "it's a MSVCRT-based program" since DOS hasn't existed
in Windows in the last approx. 7 years.

(And now if I could only get people to stop incorrectly referring to a
NT/2k/XP/Vista command prompt a DOS prompt... and I also want a pony.)

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to