On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:19:26PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 07 December 2007 17:09, Dean Scarff wrote: > >- x2.6[0-9]) >+ x2.6[0-9]*) > > > I don't see why both of those regexes wouldn't successfully match '2.61' >already. Your patch looks like it's trying to make the regex accept "2.6" >with no second digit after the decimal place as well. Can you perhaps >clarify?
Minor point of order: that's not a regex. It's a shell glob. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
