Dave Korn wrote: > I don't think it was being advocated in general, but I think it's reasonable > to assume that a pure const function like llrint isn't going to do anything > wacky.
Yes, I realize it was probably not a worry in this particular case, but I didn't want somebody stumbling on the archives at a later date and getting the bright idea that you could just go around extracting random objects from a MinGW library for use in a Cygwin link. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
