On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100)
>> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM::
>>> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't
>>> know what I and Ronald were talking about.
>>
>> If you re-read what was posted, you'll find I was totally correct
>> and addressed the points raised:
>
> This was more or less my fault as I did not read Ronald's article
> carefully enough.
Or to paraphrase, "Oh! It was *me* who didn't know what Ronald was talking
about, not /you/ after all!"
Phil, I think that's probably the nearest thing to an apology you're going to
get. That 'more or less' qualifier makes it look a bit grudging, I must say, I
guess it'll have to do ...
> As a matter of fact I stopped reading his article
> after the line where he says d does not read ~/.d.conf because this
> matched my own experience.
Bad practice. Stopping reading the moment your preconceived expectations
have been satisfied is a recipe for leading oneself into self-delusion.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
