On Jun 28 15:42, Brian Dessent wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > If you could > > check it in to the branch and generate new web docs from there, I'd be > > very glad. > > Done. It should be live on the website now too. Let me know if there's > anything that looks off.
Thanks for doing this! Looks pretty good. Just the resolver functions res_XXX should be moved back to the BSD section with the note (available in external "libminires" library) > By the way I think we should remove this cruft from the > cygwin-api.in.sgml file: > > <revhistory> > <revision> > <revnumber>0.0</revnumber> > <date>1998-08-31</date> > <authorinitials>dj</authorinitials> > <revremark>Initial revision</revremark> > </revision> > <revision> > <revnumber>0.5.0</revnumber> > <date>1998-12-17</date> > <authorinitials>noer</authorinitials> > <revremark>Add pthread, sem calls. Change revnumber to > three-part number: Cygwin API major, Cygwin API minor, Doc rev > number. Starts out at 0.5.0.</revremark> > </revision> > </revhistory> > </bookinfo> Oh, yes, you're right. I applied a patch to CVS HEAD which not only removes the revhistory but also the authorgroup from cygwin-api.in.sgml. One authorgroup in cygwin-ug.in.sgml should cover for everything, I think. I also added Joshua Daniel Franklin to the authorgroup in cygwin-ug.in.sgml, removed the revhistory there and added some dates to legal.sgml. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
