On 06 May 2007 16:38, Tim Prince wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PCYM Tim, thanks
>> On 06 May 2007 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> [removed mailing lists other than cygwin]
>>>
>>> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>>> So don't anybody here on the cygwin list get too excited yet. <g>
>>
>> Didn't actually spot the cygwin list had been cc'd in at first, but yes,
>> I'm just helping test the upstream release, this is not going to turn into
>> a cygwin package in the immediate future.
>>
>
> Is it reasonable to assume, then, that gcc 4.3 has as much chance of
> becoming a cygwin package, and put some effort into cleaning that up for
> cygwin?
All this work has to go in on mainline as a matter of course. It will then
become part of whichever is the next release branch. There's next to no
chance of getting consent to back-port what is essentially new functionality
rather than regression fixes.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
