On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:28:17 -0700 (PDT) "Peter A. Castro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, sethk wrote: > > > > > I've had some success using a different version of zsh on vista. > > > > In the UnxUtils package, there is a version of zsh, named sh. (Not copied > > or linked to zsh, for whatever reason, and, I should say, named sh.exe.) > > Two things: > 1) that's a win32 native exe, not a cygwin exe. > 2) named 'sh' it will run with a 'sh' compatable set of functionality. Both quite correct. Mixing cygwin apps with native apps does tend to get nasty, and I should have mentioned that the shell build I mentioned is not a replacement for the cygwin zsh. > > > I created a shortcut for this executable. It mostly works. I'm having some > > issues, such as relative paths not working as expected, but that's not > > surprising. > > > > Note that running this exe from cygwin bash doesn't work. As already noted, > > running the cygwin version of zsh doesn't work. > > > > I'm currently rebuilding zsh, under cygwin, to see if a version built under > > vista behaves any better than the binary distributed with cygwin. > > What version? I'm building the latest 4.3.4 for cygwin right now, but > there are issues with it, even on Win2k. > > > Seth Kurtzberg > > > > > > Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > >> > >> Kyrre Nygård wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello! > >>> > >>> I'm having some trouble running zsh on Microsoft Windows Vista: > >>> > >>> 24295 [main] zsh 3104 C:\cygwin\bin\zsh.exe: *** fatal error - unable to > >>> remap C:\cygwin\lib\zsh\4.3.2\zsh\zle.dll to same address as > >>> parent(0xAB0000) != 0xC10000 > >>> 12 [main] zsh 2020 fork: child 3104 - died waiting for dll loading, > >>> errno 11 > >>> > >>> zsh-newuser-install:929: fork failed: resource temporarily unavailable > >>> 14126 [main] zsh 1868 C:\cygwin\bin\zsh.exe: *** fatal error - unable to > >>> remap C:\cygwin\lib\zsh\4.3.2\zsh\zle.dll to same address as > >>> parent(0xAB0000) != 0xBB0000 > >>> > >>> Can this be fixed somehow? > >> > >> > >> One inquiry on each subject is sufficient. You should also check for > >> responses before any follow-up inquiry. In this case, had you done this > >> you would have seen: > >> > >> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-04/msg00599.html> > >> > >> If you don't read the email list (which you should if you post to it), > >> please let people know that you expect a direct response as well. I've > >> included your email address on this response this time. > >> > >> -- > >> Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com > >> RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office > >> 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX > >> Holliston, MA 01746 > >> > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> > >> A: Yes. > >>> Q: Are you sure? > >>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? > >> > >> -- > >> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > >> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > >> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Peter A. Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
