On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > There have been no serious objections, so I think we should go
> > ahead. Perhaps we should replace the gcc, g++, g77 etc. drivers with
> > shell scripts that look for -mno-cygwin on the command line and
> > redirect to i686-pc-mingw-{gcc,g++,etc} or to
> > i686-pc-cygwin-{gcc,g++,etc}, just to make life easier for the
> > backwardly-compatible, but I don't see any reason not to go ahead and
> > remove the option from the driver.
>
> Will using shell wrappers noticably slow down calls to gcc? Or should
> we just start explicitly calling i686-pc-cygwin-gcc instead? (FWIW
> Gentoo does the equivalent of the latter.)
I don't think speed itself will be a problem, unless the scripts are
really naive and involve lots of forks. However, as I noted before,
scripts cannot be invoked from non-Cygwin programs.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Freedom is just another word for "nothing left to lose"... -- Janis Joplin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
