On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Eric Blake, le Wed 31 Jan 2007 06:18:22 -0700, a ?crit : >> I would much rather call the cross-compiler i686-mingw-gcc than the >> current name of 'gcc -mno-cygwin'. > >Same for me.
Thinking about this some more, it seems like we'd need a real cygwin-based mingw cross compiler rather than a wrapped mingw compiler since otherwise there would be path and signal issues. And, as long as we're talking about cross-compilers, a cygwin -> linux cross compiler would probably be nice, too. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
