On Jan 23 10:18, jano trouba wrote: > if I were to do the opposite : > > port entirley the project under cygwin using cygwin sockets and X and > build the binaries with cygwin > > I would have to ship cygwin1.DLL (or is it cygwin2 ?) together with the > binaries and pay a licence fee, wouldn't I ? (I will not ship the sources, > and even if that were the case I would be selling them, and they were not > developed with cygwin).
You have to pay the fee if you don't release the sources to your customers. Whether or not you get money for your product has nothing to do with it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
