Dave Korn wrote: > We probably still would. First, the hash might collide and put two dlls in > the same slot, and second, any dll greater than 1Mb overlaps into the next > hash slot.
Well, if we found either of those things happening I think the logical choice would be to robustify the hashing code in ld to try to avoid it rather than fall back to running rebaseall again, but I take your point. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
