On Nov 23 17:39, Dave Korn wrote: > On 23 November 2006 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Nov 23 16:41, Dave Korn wrote: > >> We have a netapp here, and it doesn't do that at all. > > > > Dave, can you please send the getvolinfo output for this netapp so that > > we can look if it's using the same flags? > > FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH : TRUE > FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES : TRUE > FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK : TRUE > FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS : FALSE
Tadam! Here's the difference. John's Netapp returns TRUE for FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS. FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS is a prerequisite for getting real inode numbers, so you just don't have this problem because you already get faked inode numbers. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
