On 01 September 2006 11:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:12:59AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> Is it just me or is cygwin fork(), or a support syscall underneath,
>>> terribly slow for some reason?
>>
>> Some reason == "lack of O/S support".
>
> Yes I can understand that. I'm assuming there is some CreateProcess()
> magic happening behind the scenes. However, what I've noticed is that it
> is WAY slower than one would think it to be.
Why, how slow were *you* expecting it to be? I was expecting it to be 7.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
