On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you can try to implement a $(cygpath ...) function in
> > > make and submit *that* to the upstream maintainers.
> >
> > FWIW, I don't think such a function is a good idea, and if it is
> > proposed on the Make mailing list, I will probably object to it.
> >
> > The reason is that adding such a function goes against portability of
> > Makefiles across different ports of Make,
>
> ...which you would already have with cl commands and DOS paths...
Actually, sorry, I've misread the above. Doesn't GNU make already have a
plethora of functions not present in other makes? What's wrong with one
more? If "cygpath" is too system-specific a name, let's pick one that
isn't ("pathconv"?).
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
