On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:38:58AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:30:50PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:50:59PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:47:09AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:11:57PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >> > >On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:12:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> > >> Please test the latest snapshot (at least 2006-Apr-24) from > >> > >> > >> > >> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > >> > >> > >> > >> Please report back in this thread when you encounter a problem, which > >> > >> you can't reproduce with 1.5.18 or 1.5.19. We're interested in > >> > >> regressions in the first place. > >> > > > >> > >I'm having problems with rsync'ing perl seeming to hang that didn't > >> > >happen with 1.5.18/9 or snapshots up to 20060329. I'll try to post > >> > >cygcheck output soon. > >> > > >> > Corinna changed ssh recently. Are you using the new version? > >> > >> No, not using ssh at all. Just: > >> > >> rsync --delete -avz public.activestate.com::perl-current perl > >> > >> cygcheck attached (after backing down to 20060329). > > > >I was mistaken. It is working in 20060403 and hangs in 20060412 and > >every snapshot afterward. > > Would you be willing to try building a cygwin DLL with Corinna's > > 2006-04-04 Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * net.cc (fdsock): Raise default SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF buffer sizes to > the same values as on Linux. > > change reverted and see if that changes things? > > That's the only thing in the 20060412 that I can see which would make a > difference.
Yes, removing the setsockopt calls from fdsock does get rsync working again. Sorry it took me so long to try. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
