> > Would you mind to discuss this on bug-patch AT gnu DOT org? As far > > as my opinion counts, I'd think that aligning its behaviour with tar > > would be a good thing. But the core developers might have an entirely > > different opinion... > > > > bug-patch is not listed at http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/. > Sending the report direct to bug-patch AT gnu DOT org, I've seen no > observable > difference to /dev/null ;-) > > Is there a more appropriate place to report patch bugs?
When in doubt, enough people read bug-gnu-utils to help out, even if there is a dedicated list for that project. Also, patch is now maintained as part of diffutils, and according to http://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/, bug-gnu-utils in this case happens to be the list where diffutils issues are currently discussed. -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
