Dave Korn wrote: > ...because for some reason, despite attaching the debugger, and despite having > frozen every other thread and only left one running, every time I try to > single step it, it just carries on running as if I'd told it to continue. > Dunno why except perhaps the debugger isn't keen to try and let you > single-step through debugger-related functions in case it breaks itself or > something. This may call for a full two-machine kernel remote debugging > session in the end :-(
It's a real shame that Russinovich is apparently aware of this defect but remains uninterested in dealing with it past calling it a Cygwin deficiency. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
