On Apr 21 15:09, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna said [in thread entitled "Windows 95 support ?"] > > Just the setup tool has some problem, apparently. Cygwin still runs on 95, > > which will probably change at one point, since it's getting incredibly > > awkward to support it. > > I've a related question: how "pleasant" must the user experience be on > older operating systems? Specifically, my [still in ITP state] port of
Think along the lines of "it's the OSes fault, not mine", and you'll feel better immediately. > Sleep(40)!! ^^^^^^^^^ > It would also work on older OS's -- but every invocation would incur a > 40 second delay. Which is really *mean*. I'm not sure I'm ready for Wouldn't that be a 40 *milli*second delay? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
