On Apr 21 16:58, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Lars Munch, le Fri 21 Apr 2006 16:48:31 +0200, a écrit : > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > That's a problem with the code you're working on. If it relies on the > > > fact that int32_t resp. uint32_t are typedef'ed as "int", then it > > > contradicts the purpose of stdint.h, which is, not relying on the > > > definition of underlying datatypes. > > > > Thanks for the explanation and you are absolutely right, but isn't using > > long instead of int a potential problem, since long is usually 64bit on > > a 64bit system whereas int is usually 32 bit and both 32bit and 64bit > > systems? > > When 64bits will be supported, there will be an ifdef here.
It's that simple :-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
