On 02 March 2006 14:31, Jerry D. Hedden wrote:

>> While diff'ing snapshots, I noted that libm.info is in the 2006-02-24
>> snapshot, but is not in the 2006-03-01 snapshot.  Is this an oversight?
>>  (Is there some chance that this relates to the missing isnand problem?)
> 
> To clarify the parenthetically question, I know that libm.info is docs;
> not
> code.  But does this indicate some sort of change/error in the build
> process?
  A minor one in the newlib docs build:

http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2006/msg00135.html

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to