On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:59:50AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Christopher Faylor on 2/21/2006 6:06 PM: >>Please observe usual bug reporting rules when reporting on any results >>from testing a snapshot. > >I'm seeing a few regressions on Win98 with 20060220, 20060223. They >are making it impossible for me to test CVS coreutils against the >latest snapshot on Win98. I haven't had time to further track down >where the regressions started, as I haven't otherwise used snapshots on >Win98 since 1.5.19 came out.
The new directory handling code had a problem on win9x. It would cause random memory corruption. The new snapshot should work better. I was able to configure and build bash with the equivalent of this snashot. Does it work any better for you, Eric? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
