On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:57:00AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If we don't get a single person indicating that they rely on the current
> behavior then I'm ok with changing it.  We have a patch ready to be
> checked in, in fact.

I assume that:

   $ PATH="/foo::$PATH" cmd /c printenv PATH

will continue to show 

   /foo:./:yaddayadda

with the patch?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to