On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:45:28PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 20 13:50, Sam Steingold wrote: > > >> > On Mar 10 16:00, Sam Steingold wrote: > > >> >> /proc/<pid>/exe points to "foo", not to "foo.exe", so it cannot be > > >> >> opened &c. > > >> > ^^^^ > > >> > ???? > > >> > > >> how do I find out which file is running if /proc/<pid>/exe cannot be > > >> opened? > > > > > > access(2) or stat(2) > > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/access.html > > the above spec of access appears to indicate that if access() succeeds > > then open() must succeed too. > > this is not the case in cygwin: /proc/self/exe cannot be open()ed. > > I've just checked in a patch which tacks on the .exe suffix to > /proc/$PID/exe, as well as a patch to realpath which returns the > pathname with .exe suffix, even if the original name has no suffix > given. We will give this a try. Please test the next snapshot.
Mostly for the archives, I note that this makes perl's $^X variable include the ".exe" suffix. This is probably a good thing, but at the moment triggers a test failure. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
