> > So I guess it's now up to the cvs maintainer to try tracking this down (or > reporting this as a bug upstream). FWIW, I've looked at the sources of > 1.11.17 and didn't see where that "." was added. Did anyone try this with > a test cvs-1.11.21-1?
My experience with cvs-1.11.21-1 is that it loses track of conflicts. In other words, in cvs-1.11.17, if I do: $ cvs up C foo $ cvs up C foo but in cvs-1.11.21, I get: $ cvs up C foo $ cvs up M foo I would much rather see conflicts every time I update, so I haven't done much further testing of 1.11.21. -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
