Cliff Hones wrote: > > Can this explain failures to initialize executables which don't use > threads? I don't know, but I wouldn't have thought 'ls' uses threads.
*Everything* uses threads, but many apps only use one thread.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
