On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote: >>Does the strace log hint at a solution? Is there any other test I >>might try that would help you debug this? > >The latest snapshot has better strace capabilities. Rather than trying >to munge your sshd service startup, please just start it as normal and, >from a privileged account, use "strace -ostrace.out -pNNNN" to capture >the output, where NNNN is the pid of the sshd process. You need to do >this from an account which has enough privileges to both find the sshd >process and to allow strace to access it. Either "ps -W" or taskman >should show the pid of the running sshd.exe. > >Please use the latest DLL and the latest version of strace.exe from the >snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Is there any movement on this? If multiple people can duplicate the problem I would think that we'd have at least one person posting strace results. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
