On 12/07/2005, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>There has been one (1) reply to this message from someone who said that
>> they liked it. I don't think that it yet has a ringing endorsement from
>> the community so I think it is premature for Corinna or me to get
>> involved.
Well, actually there are two now (fergus and my humble entity). That
makes a overwhelming majority of 100 % (= one hundred percent) who
like the "new logo".
;-)
Well, not to ruin that statistic or to be a spoil-sport but I prefer the
the current logo. But I guess I'm just a traditionalist. ;-)
I should say that I don't make this remark to denigrate Denis's efforts.
And assuming this thread takes off (ugh, my mailbox... my poor mailbox! ;-) ),
I'm guessing my view would be in the minority. Personally, I wouldn't mind
seeing this open up into a run-off of a few (or more) different designs. I
mean, if we're going to consider a new logo, let's have some options! :-)
Can anyone work an otter or a hippo into the logo? ;-) ;-) ;-)
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
