Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I'll try to rebuild libstdc++ now with _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING
defined and will report back if there is interest. I would like to help
to get this issue resolved.
Yes, much appreciated. Please CC me when you report back!
I rebuilt libstdc++ with --enable-fully-dynamic-string and preliminary
testing showed that both the testcase and the program that I am porting
behave fine. I'll do more testing in the next few days. I haven't done any
benchmarks so far. Any suggestions/ideas on how to test whether the speed
has decreased due to --enable-fully-dynamic-string ?
Maybe you find some more hints at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
I will probably use the flag to rebuild gcc with this changed libstdc++,
regardless if there is a performance issue or not.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
