Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 18 12:39, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without
smbntsec. I forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I
can't think of a situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec
but not honor smbntsec...
When the SMB server doesn't reflect the permissions correctly,
IMHO then that problem should be corrected.
That's a good idea. I'm sure the Samba team will happily consider patches.
Ah, I see. I was confused. I thought that by SMB server what was meant
was Microsoft's own SMB based service - not the OpenSource Samba Server
running on Linux. Still I believe that defaults should be set for common
situations. Is it more common that a Cygwin user on a Windows box is
dealing with SMB mounts from a Windows Server or a Linux Server using Samba.
In any event I do indeed use a Linux machine at home and do use Samba to
share things. I also use smbntsec. I haven't seen any problems but since
I have Linux I tend to just ssh there and work with the command line
there directly. Can you describe or point to these problems in Samba and
how they manifest themselves?
--
If I melted dry ice, could I swim in it and not get wet?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
