On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:29:17AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >This particular problem must've been fixed by some other patch.
> >Nonetheless, now that the make maintainer is aware that there is a bug,
> >he'll likely look into releasing the updated version of make at some
> >point. Since he's a volunteer (like the rest of us), he'll do it on his
> >own schedule (the bug is relatively minor, and there's a workaround, so
> >this probably won't happen soon).
>
> Actually, I think I've said on more than one occasion that I'm waiting
> for an official upstream make release before I make the next cygwin
> release of make.
Ok, so you looked into it ("at some point") and decided to wait until an
upstream release (which "probably won't happen soon"). You gotta admit, I
was close... :-)
Seriously, though -- since your policy is to only package upstream
releases of make, maybe stating this in future announcements would quell
some of the requests for updates...
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
