On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:31:12PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > Is there going to be any part of this interpreter that isn't a "no-no"? > You're going to longjmp() around all your crazy malloc'd stacks? Seriously > Chris, how is it that you can come up with all these wild... Schemes... and > yet you can't just admit you've taken a wrong turn at Albequerque and do > things in a sane way?
No, it's perl that longjmps around crazy malloc'd stacks. But at least it doesn't set registers to them, and is slow as molasses because of it. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
