Christopher Faylor wrote: > >So, anyone who installs rebase will also need to install bash. That > ash > >seems unfortunate to me. It means we can never deprecate ash.
Since cygcheck already has capability for reading package file lists (/etc/setup/*.lst.gz) do you think it would be sensible to move the 'rebaseall' logic into cygcheck, so that we don't need a shell? But I suppose that doesn't get around the issue of not being able to run it from a bash CMD prompt as you can currently. Though I guess it could be installed as a shortcut on the startup menu or something. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
