On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:50:38PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:24:20PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> >But what was wrong with my idea of making rebaseall a #!/bin/ash >> >script? >> >> You still couldn't run the script from bash since the dlls would still >> be loaded. That would mean that you'd have to do something like: >> >> c:\>ash rebaseall >> >> (Currently rebaseall won't work as an ash script but the fix is >> trivial) >> >> I guess that's better than nothing but I still think that just not >> rebasing the bash dlls is going to result in fewer mailing list >> complaints. > >My inclination is to convert rebaseall to an ash script.
Once again, let me point out -- that will not solve the problem. You won't be able to run the script from bash, for obvious reasons. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
