On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
> ----Original Message----
> >From: Igor Pechtchanski
> >Sent: 11 July 2005 16:26
>
> > Would
> >
> > UNIVERSAL_NAME_INFO szBuff;
> > UNIVERSAL_NAME_INFO *puni = &szBuff;
> >
> > work better? I'm not familiar with UNIVERSAL_NAME_INFO, but the above
> > assumes it's no larger than 2k in size.
>
> No it doesn't. Check cbBuff.
Yes, it does. I'm not saying it'll write over 2k into the struct, I'm
saying the WNetGetUniversalName call may return a weird error if it's
unable to completely fill in the struct.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
