Dave Korn wrote: > > In any case, this should not ICE so you should file a gcc PR. > > But 3.3.x branch is closed now, and the bug is fixed in 3.4.x, so there's > really very little point.
I did in fact skim the whole thread before replying but in my skimming I thought that it was ICEing under 3.4 and working under 3.3, which I now see is the reverse. (Where 'working' is defined as correctly identifying the stupidity of this code with a warning or error.) So, nevermind about the PR. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
