Andreas Eibach wrote: > This is VERY bad. You can only search for "Apache and 2 and 0 and 54", but > not for apache and 2.0.54 (read 2 dot 0 dot 54 _in this order_). Quotes > aren't accepted either; I think as the mailing lists archives are that > important and used so much, there should at least be an exact match. No user > wants to delve through 500 or 1000 messages with 450 or 950 of them > irrelevant. (Rant over.)
The htdig on cygwin.com is pretty bad. I always use google to search the archives. You can do this easily with a query of: site:cygwin.com inurl:cygwin inurl:ml <query words here> You can even use more "inurl:"s to restrict by year/month since those are part of the URL. In addition, the list is archived at many other places, all of which have searches. Three that come to mind are gmane.org, marc.theaimsgroup.com, and mail-archive.com. > Nice thing about Apache 2.0.54 is that it compiles OOTB without any errors. > Nice. See the other recent thread. It will probably take some patching to work. Off the top of my head I'd suggest having cygserver installed and running for both the configure/make and when starting apache, so that you get the IPC functions. For testing, it will probably be easier to skip trying to run it as a service and get it running first when just starting it from the prompt. Make sure it's not trying to switch user accounts though because this will not work outside of the SYSTEM account. Alternatively you can try starting it from a SYSTEM-shell (search archives) which will simulate the service-startup environment and allow for easier debugging of why it won't start. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
