On Jun 11 12:42, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:04:22PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > > Steve Kelem wrote: > > > Okay. I ran rebase. Then I get the same problem. > > > > I just noticed that ruby uses .so for the name of its dynamic modules, > > but I think the rebaseall script only looks for .dll. Make a list of > > all the .so files in the ruby package and pass that to rebaseall with > > the -T flag, or modify the rebaseall script to look for files ending > > in .so. I think this could be a bug in the rebaseall script. > > Do others agree? If so, then I will change rebaseall to look for .so > files too. Any other extensions besides .so?
I agree and *.so is the only other extension, AFAICS. The next OpenSSL version will bring them, too. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
