On 5/10/05, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:27:02PM -0400, William M. (Mike) Miller wrote: > >On 5/10/05, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Previous to 1.5.16, static destructors were always called via a > >> gcc "atexit" mechanism. This meant that there were scenarios where > >> destructors would not be called at all so I made cygwin's exit call > >> the destructors explicitly. I just forgot to make cygwin do the right > >> thing when returning from main rather than exiting. This will be > >> fixed in the next snapshot. > > > >Sorry, one more question. I thought from the above that > >reinstalling 1.5.15 would restore the previous behavior for static > >destructors. According to cygcheck, I now have cygwin 1.5.15-1 > >installed, but I still don't see the static destructor output. Is there > >something else I need to revert while waiting for the fix? > > Install the snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Yep, fixed. Thanks again. -- William M. (Mike) Miller | Edison Design Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
